Hey, look at that — it’s almost September. The annoying kids are gone from my cool, late 20-something type hangouts, and back in school where they belong, learning fractions and other things they’ll use to drive me out of whatever cushy, entrenched white collar job I’m desperately clinging to thirty years from now. Actually, thirty years from now, they’ll probably be being driven out of whatever job they stole from me, so that’s not the best example. The important thing is that they’re learning fractions, though, and not in line with me at Chipotle.
It’s also stopped being unbearably hot, which is nice, because I hadn’t done anything outside in about a month until just last week. Want to know what else is going on?
1. The Red Sox lost a couple of times, leading terrible fans like me to shrug awkwardly and wait for football. Given the fact that I famously (amongst my roommates, at least) threw a chair across the room in 2003 after Tim Wakefield gave up that stupid Aaron Boone home run, you’d think I’d be a little more passionate about the whole thing, but frankly I never managed to get excited about the Red Sox from day one this year. I can follow a doomed football team, or a doomed basketball team, but following a doomed baseball team just seems pointless.
2. Speaking of football; Steve and I were talking the other day about the increasingly uncomfortable (and unavoidable) reality that professional football is a horrible, exploitative enterprise I should be thoroughly embarrassed to enjoy as much as I do. As if to punch me in the face with that slow realization, somebody linked to this Deadspin piece today, which is pretty much exactly spot on. Now, of course, Deadspin isn’t coming right out and saying I shouldn’t like football, but they are providing an irritatingly revealing perspective that’s making me feel like… I probably shouldn’t like football. And yes, I’ve already taken the players side on this kind of thing before, in regards to money — but still, I find myself enthusiastically supporting a system that continues to flaunt the fact that it basically doesn’t give a crap about the young, generally ignorant poor people who make it a lot of money at no risk to itself, and I don’t know if I can do that forever.
3. Excellent — now that we’re talking about money, let’s talk about how I still can’t afford a house, or anything remotely resembling a house. Should I be able to? Hard to say. But at these prices, it’s equally hard to blame me for not buying, which is exactly why me and the Missus are still renting (happily, by the way). I do find it rather amusing, though, that after being told for an entire calendar year that I had to buy now, that prices were actually too low, and that no one needed my purchase so I should hurry up and make one, the same people are freaking out because I didn’t listen to them. “HE STILL WON’T BUY??? WHY WON’T HE BUY?????” I keep telling you clowns, I just don’t want to pay that much for a house. That’s it. It’s not “job insecurity”, it’s not “an unstable market”, and it’s not mortgage rates. I don’t want to borrow half a million freaking dollars to buy a tiny house that probably needs work. I’m okay if that means I never get to own a house. Are you okay with never getting to sell it? Oh yeah, the point of this is that Calculated Risk says the only thing we can do is let prices actually drop — like, fo’ real. Sounds good to me… but I’ll believe it when I see it.
4. Finally, here’s a pretty cool interview in the Economist with Jay Rosen, media-guy. Want a quote?
DiA: In Washington a lot of reporting takes the form of left v right. As you say, “The two party system and the journalist’s method of pushing off from both sides to generate authority fit perfectly together.” How does this lead to poor journalism?
Mr Rosen: Many ways. When both parties are closed to certain ideas, the news system becomes closed to them, too. Not good. When journalists get attacked from the left and the right, they take it as confirmation that they’re doing something right, when they could be doing everything wrong. There’s a certain laziness that creeps up too, which you can hear in phrases from the commentariat like “extremists on both sides”. No attempt to actually examine centre and margin and compare them across parties; instead, this sorry act of positioning, in which the political centre is associated with truth, common sense and realism. This is a very common prejudice in political journalism.
Outstanding. That ought to keep you people busy for a while. Tomorrow, Jeff-tron and I try to make a radio show.